Rostery
Aged Care

Support at Home vs Home Care Packages: What Changes for Providers

Support at Home replaces Home Care Packages, and the mechanics change more than the name. Quarterly budgets instead of accruing funds, a defined service list, and means-tested contributions you have to collect.

FFahid Safdar·31 August 2026·4 min read
Support at Home vs Home Care Packages: What Changes for Providers

Support at Home is the Australian Government program for aged care delivered in a person's own home, replacing Home Care Packages and the Short-Term Restorative Care Programme. Older people are assessed into classification levels with a quarterly budget, and contribute to the cost of their care according to their means and the category of service they receive.

For providers, this is not a rename. The funding mechanics change in ways that touch billing, cash flow and the software you run on.

What Support at Home changes operationally

1. Quarterly budgets replace accruing funds

Under Home Care Packages, unspent funds accumulated. A client could build a balance over months and spend it later, and that balance followed them between providers. Support at Home works to a quarterly budget instead, with limited carry-over.

The practical consequence is that underspend is no longer banked indefinitely. Service planning has to fit the quarter, and a client who is under-serviced for two months cannot simply catch up in month twelve. Providers whose systems were built around unspent-funds tracking need reworking rather than remapping — the concept the software is organised around has gone.

2. A defined service list

Support at Home organises services into categories — broadly clinical care, independence, and everyday living — with a defined list of services under each. This is more prescriptive than the package model, where the care plan had wider latitude.

It also determines what the client pays, which brings us to the third change.

3. Means-tested contributions, by service category

Client contributions vary by both the person's means and the category of service. Clinical care attracts no client contribution. Independence and everyday living do, at rates that differ.

Service categoryClient contribution
Clinical careNone
IndependenceMeans-tested
Everyday livingMeans-tested, at the highest rate of the three

This is the change with the largest administrative footprint. A provider now has to categorise every service correctly, calculate a contribution per client per category, invoice it, collect it, and reconcile it — alongside the government subsidy, which arrives separately. That is an accounts-receivable function that home care providers did not previously need at this scale.

What this means for your systems

Working backwards from the changes above, a system needs to:

  • Hold a quarterly budget per client and show consumption against it during the quarter, not after
  • Map every delivered service to its category, because the category sets the contribution
  • Calculate contributions per client from their assessed means
  • Produce a client statement that separates subsidy from contribution intelligibly
  • Track contribution debtors — an aged receivable that did not previously exist
  • Report to the Data Exchange on sessions delivered, which is not the same data as what was invoiced

That last point catches providers whose systems only record billable events. DEX reports sessions of service, and reconstructing session data by hand at the end of a reporting period is a job nobody has time for.

Where SIRS fits

The Serious Incident Response Scheme continues to apply. Reportable categories include unreasonable use of force, unlawful or inappropriate sexual conduct, neglect, psychological or emotional abuse, unexpected death, stealing or coercion, and unexplained absence. Priority 1 incidents are reported within 24 hours, Priority 2 within 30 days.

As with the NDIS, external reporting is only half the obligation: providers must operate an incident management system that records, investigates and learns from incidents whether or not they meet the reportable threshold.

If you deliver both NDIS and aged care

A meaningful number of Australian providers do, and they are usually running two systems because the funding models never matched.

The delivery side is largely the same work — the same workers, the same rostering constraints, the same award, often the same suburbs. It is the funding, claiming and reporting that differ. That makes a single operational platform with two funding engines a better fit than two complete systems, if only because a support worker should not need two apps to see one day's shifts.

Program rules, classification levels, contribution rates and caps are set by the Department of Health and Aged Care and are subject to change. Confirm current settings before making commercial decisions.

#Support at Home#aged care#Home Care Packages#SIRS#DEX
F

Written by

Fahid Safdar

Founder & Product

Fahid built Rostery after seeing how much of an NDIS provider's week disappears into administration that software should have handled. He works directly on the parts of the platform where being wrong costs money or breaches an obligation: SCHADS award interpretation from approved actual times, NDIS claim files validated against the current price guide before they are uploaded, travel and kilometre capture, and the tenant isolation that keeps one provider's participant data unreachable from another's. He writes here about the operational rules themselves — what they say, where providers get caught, and what a system has to do to get them right.

NDISSCHADS AwardNDIS claimingrosteringSupport at Homeprovider compliance

Found this useful?

Share it with your NDIS network.

Start Today

Ready to modernise your NDIS operations?

Join 600+ providers using Rostery to manage rostering, compliance, and billing — all in one place.

No obligation · Australian support team · Your data stays in Australia